matthiasblaesing commented on PR #6212: URL: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/6212#issuecomment-1666829540
@asbachb I have mixed feelings here, but I doubt, that we see the same screw up again. I assume, that the next Jakarta EE version will retain its backwards compatibilty. The massive breaking going from JavaEE to JakartaEE was expected and if it is repeated, I assume, that the platform will die. So I assume that the question `isEjb40Supported` and `isEjb40LiteSupported` both can be answered positively for the next specification versions, because it is true. If they again break namespaces or packages, well, then yes, it will break again and IMHO validly so. I'm not the one that did the work the last time round, so the opinions of @pepness, @juneau001, @jGauravGupta and @OndroMih would be helpful. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
