grimly opened a new issue, #6427:
URL: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues/6427

   ### Apache NetBeans version
   
   Apache NetBeans 19
   
   ### What happened
   
   When applying a suggestion that would suppress a warning in a record 
constructor, the constructor code would be corrupted and invalid code would be 
left behind.
   
   Given the following code :
   
   ```java
   public record MyRecord<E>(Object obj, E typed) {
     public MyRecord {
       typed = (E)obj;
     }
   }
   ```
   
   The cast obviously raises an `unchecked` warning.
   Trying to resolve it with the `Suppress Warning - unchecked` option it turns 
the code into the following invalid code :
   
   ```java
   public record MyRecord<E>(Object obj, E typed) {
     @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
     public {
       typed = (E)obj;
     }
   }
   ```
   
   Instead, this is the expected code:
   
   ```java
   public record MyRecord<E>(Object obj, E typed) {
     @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
     public MyRecord {
       typed = (E)obj;
     }
   }
   ```
   
   ### How to reproduce
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Did this work correctly in an earlier version?
   
   No / Don't know
   
   ### Operating System
   
   Windows 11
   
   ### JDK
   
   Temurin-17.0.8.1+1
   
   ### Apache NetBeans packaging
   
   Apache NetBeans binary zip
   
   ### Anything else
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Are you willing to submit a pull request?
   
   No


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

Reply via email to