matthiasblaesing commented on issue #8240:
URL: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues/8240#issuecomment-2659888298

   > > If this is touched, other logging frameworks should also be considered. 
SLF4J/Log4J2/Logback/commons-logging all can be valid selections for logging. 
It would be good if this would be per project.
   > 
   > Before `Java 9` I would 100% agree. But now, doesn't `System.Logger` make 
all of these selectable at run-time rather than hard-coding?
   
   SLF4J existed for how long? Sorry, but I see https://xkcd.com/927/ here. 
Just as the module system of java faces an uphill battle, the same is true for 
logging systems.
   
   I have projects where the framework mandates logback, a CMS that mandates 
SLF4J and has legacy use of log4j, local projects that use JUL. Only the latter 
could be changed, all others have to integrate with their corresponding 
ecosystem.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: notifications-h...@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

Reply via email to