Kyra Pritzel-Hentley created OFBIZ-9452:
-------------------------------------------

             Summary: [FB] Package org.apache.ofbiz.accounting.tax
                 Key: OFBIZ-9452
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9452
             Project: OFBiz
          Issue Type: Sub-task
          Components: accounting
    Affects Versions: Trunk
            Reporter: Kyra Pritzel-Hentley
            Priority: Minor


TaxAuthorityServices.java:60, MS_SHOULD_BE_FINAL
* MS: 
org.apache.ofbiz.accounting.tax.TaxAuthorityServices.salestaxFinalDecimals 
isn't final but should be
This static field public but not final, and could be changed by malicious code 
or by accident from another package. The field could be made final to avoid 
this vulnerability.

TaxAuthorityServices.java:61, MS_SHOULD_BE_FINAL
* MS: org.apache.ofbiz.accounting.tax.TaxAuthorityServices.salestaxCalcDecimals 
isn't final but should be
This static field public but not final, and could be changed by malicious code 
or by accident from another package. The field could be made final to avoid 
this vulnerability.

TaxAuthorityServices.java:62, MS_SHOULD_BE_FINAL
* MS: org.apache.ofbiz.accounting.tax.TaxAuthorityServices.salestaxRounding 
isn't final but should be
This static field public but not final, and could be changed by malicious code 
or by accident from another package. The field could be made final to avoid 
this vulnerability.

TaxAuthorityServices.java:168, NP_LOAD_OF_KNOWN_NULL_VALUE
* NP: Load of known null value in 
org.apache.ofbiz.accounting.tax.TaxAuthorityServices.rateProductTaxCalc(DispatchContext,
 Map)
The variable referenced at this point is known to be null due to an earlier 
check against null. Although this is valid, it might be a mistake (perhaps you 
intended to refer to a different variable, or perhaps the earlier check to see 
if the variable is null should have been a check to see if it was non-null).

TaxAuthorityServices.java:213, RCN_REDUNDANT_NULLCHECK_OF_NONNULL_VALUE
* RCN: Redundant nullcheck of shippingAddress, which is known to be non-null in 
org.apache.ofbiz.accounting.tax.TaxAuthorityServices.rateProductTaxCalc(DispatchContext,
 Map)
This method contains a redundant check of a known non-null value against the 
constant null.

TaxAuthorityServices.java:388,RCN_REDUNDANT_NULLCHECK_WOULD_HAVE_BEEN_A_NPE
* RCN: Nullcheck of taxAuthorityRateProduct at line 388 of value previously 
dereferenced in 
org.apache.ofbiz.accounting.tax.TaxAuthorityServices.getTaxAdjustments(Delegator,
 GenericValue, GenericValue, String, String, Set, BigDecimal, BigDecimal, 
BigDecimal, BigDecimal, BigDecimal)
A value is checked here to see whether it is null, but this value can't be null 
because it was previously dereferenced and if it were null a null pointer 
exception would have occurred at the earlier dereference. Essentially, this 
code and the previous dereference disagree as to whether this value is allowed 
to be null. Either the check is redundant or the previous dereference is 
erroneous.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to