Nicolas Malin commented on OFBIZ-10221:

No objections, just a suggest that it would be more generic to convert the 
current ftl to xml instead of improve the ftl. But sure this conversion will be 
realize in a future

> Improve layout and structure of forms
> -------------------------------------
>                 Key: OFBIZ-10221
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10221
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Julian Leichert
>            Assignee: Michael Brohl
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 17.12.01
>         Attachments: OFBIZ-10221_webtools.entity.ArtifactInfo.patch, 
> OFBIZ-10221_webtools.entity.CheckDb.patch, 
> OFBIZ-10221_webtools.entity.EntityExportAll.patch, 
> OFBIZ-10221_webtools.entity.EntityImport.patch, 
> OFBIZ-10221_webtools.entity.EntityImportDir.patch, 
> OFBIZ-10221_webtools.entity.EntityImportReaders.patch, 
> OFBIZ-10221_webtools.entity.FetchLogs.patch, 
> OFBIZ-10221_webtools.entity.ViewDataFile.patch, 
> OFBIZ-10221_webtools.entity.XmlDsDump.patch
> While working at a Theme, i discovered that the forms differ in their style 
> and structure.
>  I propose a standard form-structure, so that further styling and look is 
> coherent.
>  I.e. class definitions ( class="basic-form") are often missing, input-fields 
> vary in size and the layout does not follow a standard structure.
> As mentioned in 
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3654e2f8ee3a7f8d6dd6e9dfe8b4184d11d4609a811daa03f6ab2805@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E]
> I have attached an example patch, which modifies a form defined in FreeMarker 
> to conform it to the forms defined in any *Forms.xml.
> Often those forms within FreeMarker templates differ from most other forms in 
> Ofbiz,
> I propose a refactoring of these FreeMarker forms, to equalize all forms.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

Reply via email to