[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16602687#comment-16602687
]
Nicolas Malin edited comment on OFBIZ-10540 at 9/4/18 7:32 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
At the beginning, I didn't understand why I have this warning ... now I
understand, in my mind WorkEffortContactMech has been the same pattern for
OrderContactMech. But not, and after many read, I didn't see the error, like an
illusion :/ .
So WorkEffortContactMech haven't contactMechPurposeTypeId and this change the
generic function that I introduce during the reformat. I upload a corrective
patch [^OFBIZ-10540.patch](no tested at all yet) if you want control it (now I
doubt :) ). Oh I see you path to later, I will include it on mine. Thanks
[~deepak.nigam]
[~deepak.dixit] I didn't see any performance issue by the view-entity
inclusion, I used it to homogenize source code, centralize the contactMech view
logical and apply same pattern to help generic function creation. With your
remark, I will recheck it to be sure.
was (Author: soledad):
At the beginning, I didn't understand why I have this warning ... now I
understand, in my mind WorkEffortContactMech has been the same pattern for
OrderContactMech. But not, and after many read, I didn't see the error, like an
illusion :/ .
So WorkEffortContactMech haven't contactMechPurposeTypeId and this change the
generic function that I introduce during the reformat. I upload a corrective
patch [^OFBIZ-10540.patch](no tested at all yet) if you want control it (now I
doubt :) ).
[~deepak.dixit] I didn't see any performance issue by the view-entity
inclusion, I used it to homogenize source code, centralize the contactMech view
logical and apply same pattern to help generic function creation. With your
remark, I will recheck it to be sure.
> Warning in console logs related to entity definitions
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-10540
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10540
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ALL COMPONENTS
> Affects Versions: Trunk
> Reporter: Deepak Nigam
> Assignee: Nicolas Malin
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-10540.patch, OFBiz-10540.patch, OFBiz-10540.patch
>
>
> On trunk, following warnings related to entity definitions are coming:
> 2018-08-27 14:10:32,129 |delegator-startup-1 |GenericDelegator |W| =-=-=-=-=
> Found 5 warnings when checking the entity definitions:
> 2018-08-27 14:10:32,130 |delegator-startup-1 |GenericDelegator |W|
> [RelationRelatedFieldNotFound] The field "partyId" of related entity
> FacilityContactMech was specified in the keymaps but is not found for
> relation FacilityContactMech of entity FacilityAndContactMech.
> 2018-08-27 14:10:32,131 |delegator-startup-1 |GenericDelegator |W|
> [RelationFieldNotFound] The field partyId was specified in the keymaps but is
> not found for relation FacilityContactMech of entity FacilityAndContactMech.
> 2018-08-27 14:10:32,131 |delegator-startup-1 |GenericDelegator |W|
> [RelationRelatedFieldNotFound] The field "contactMechPurposeTypeId" of
> related entity WorkEffortContactMech was specified in the keymaps but is not
> found for relation WorkEffortContactMech of entity WorkEffortAndContactMech.
> 2018-08-27 14:10:32,131 |delegator-startup-1 |GenericDelegator |W|
> [RelationFieldNotFound] The field contactMechPurposeTypeId was specified in
> the keymaps but is not found for relation WorkEffortContactMech of entity
> WorkEffortAndContactMech.
> 2018-08-27 14:10:32,131 |delegator-startup-1 |GenericDelegator |W|
> [RelationFieldNotFound] The field contactMechPurposeTypeId was specified in
> the keymaps but is not found for relation ContactMechPurposeType of entity
> WorkEffortAndContactMech.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
