[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16839209#comment-16839209
 ] 

Pawan Verma edited comment on OFBIZ-11029 at 5/14/19 8:41 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

Nice Catch, Yes it should be isVirtual instead of productId. Attached patch for 
the same and also handled a NullPointerException for variantProduct.

I have also updated Affected Version(s).


was (Author: pawan.verma):
Nice Catch, Yes it should be isVirtual instead of productId. Attached patch for 
the same and also handled a NullPointerException for variantProduct.

> Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-11029
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: product
>    Affects Versions: Trunk, 16.11.05, Release Branch 17.12, 18.12.01
>            Reporter: Denglong Zhou
>            Assignee: Pawan Verma
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: product, variant
>         Attachments: OFBIZ-11029.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 0.25h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> public static List<GenericValue> getVariantSelectionFeatures(GenericValue 
> variantProduct) {
> if (!"Y".equals(variantProduct.getString("isVariant"))) {
> return null;
> }
> GenericValue virtualProduct = 
> ProductWorker.getParentProduct(variantProduct.getString("productId"), 
> variantProduct.getDelegator());
> if (virtualProduct == null || 
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("productId"))) {
> return null;
> }
> {code}
> for the above coding, i guess the part colored by red should be the following,
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> if (virtualProduct == null || 
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("isVirtual"))) {
> {code}
> thanks!
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to