[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17194933#comment-17194933
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on OFBIZ-11947:
---------------------------------------------------------

Commit dc20b7932482dfe58cced4240f30d54dab4f0dd6 in ofbiz-plugins's branch 
refs/heads/trunk from Suraj Khurana
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ofbiz-plugins.git;h=dc20b79 ]

Improved: Added missing Javadocs for some methods, this is required for all 
classes which looks like designed for extension (can be subclassed).
(OFBIZ-11947)
Thanks Jacques for review.


> Checkstyle: Add Javadoc for classes designed for extension
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-11947
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11947
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: ALL COMPONENTS
>    Affects Versions: Trunk
>            Reporter: Suraj Khurana
>            Assignee: Suraj Khurana
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: OFBIZ-11947-2.patch, OFBIZ-11947-3.patch, 
> OFBIZ-11947-plugins-3.patch, OFBIZ-11947-plugins.patch, OFBIZ-11947.patch
>
>
> For checkstyle errors:
> Class 'ResourceInfo' looks like designed for extension (can be subclassed), 
> but the method 'createResourceHandler' does not have javadoc that explains 
> how to do that safely. If class is not designed for extension consider making 
> the class 'ResourceInfo' final or making the method 'createResourceHandler' 
> static/final/abstract/empty, or adding allowed annotation for the method.
> We need to add missing javadocs for all such methods



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to