[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17194933#comment-17194933 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on OFBIZ-11947: --------------------------------------------------------- Commit dc20b7932482dfe58cced4240f30d54dab4f0dd6 in ofbiz-plugins's branch refs/heads/trunk from Suraj Khurana [ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ofbiz-plugins.git;h=dc20b79 ] Improved: Added missing Javadocs for some methods, this is required for all classes which looks like designed for extension (can be subclassed). (OFBIZ-11947) Thanks Jacques for review. > Checkstyle: Add Javadoc for classes designed for extension > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFBIZ-11947 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11947 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: ALL COMPONENTS > Affects Versions: Trunk > Reporter: Suraj Khurana > Assignee: Suraj Khurana > Priority: Major > Attachments: OFBIZ-11947-2.patch, OFBIZ-11947-3.patch, > OFBIZ-11947-plugins-3.patch, OFBIZ-11947-plugins.patch, OFBIZ-11947.patch > > > For checkstyle errors: > Class 'ResourceInfo' looks like designed for extension (can be subclassed), > but the method 'createResourceHandler' does not have javadoc that explains > how to do that safely. If class is not designed for extension consider making > the class 'ResourceInfo' final or making the method 'createResourceHandler' > static/final/abstract/empty, or adding allowed annotation for the method. > We need to add missing javadocs for all such methods -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)