[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17440566#comment-17440566
]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-5996:
-------------------------------------
[~mbrohl]
Before we go into your latest set of questions and remarks, let's first address
the other elephant in the room: are you going to be offensive and insensitive
(like you were yesterday) to others again?
A mental illness (including psychosis) is something that happens to 1 in 3 to 5
persons nowadays (depending on where the research comes from). Having to
overcome such an illness is no easy feat and relapses are on the brink of
happening when the (social) environment is hostile.
And such an illness affects an even greater number of relatives, potentially
leading to them being traumatised or causing other kinds of mental instability.
And such traumas or mental instability can be triggered again by the remarks
you posted.
Do you realise how utterly inappropriate your comment was?
> Handling of Agreement Role(s)
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-5996
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5996
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: accounting
> Affects Versions: Trunk
> Reporter: Pierre Smits
> Assignee: Pierre Smits
> Priority: Major
> Labels: agreement(s), role, roles
>
> The roles screen on an agreement enable the user to add any party into any
> role on the agreement.
> An example, user bizadmin can select party DemoEmployee for role PACKER and
> try to persist this agreement role. This leads to an error, like below:
> {code:java}
> The Following Errors Occurred:Error doing entity-auto operation for entity
> AgreementRole in service createAgreementRole:
> org.apache.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException:
> org.apache.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException: Error while inserting:
> [GenericEntity:AgreementRole][agreementId,AGR_SALES(java.lang.String)][createdStamp,2021-11-04
> 11:14:26.779(java.sql.Timestamp)][createdTxStamp,2021-11-04
> 11:14:26.779(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedStamp,2021-11-04
> 11:14:26.779(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2021-11-04
> 11:14:26.779(java.sql.Timestamp)][partyId,DemoEmployee(java.lang.String)][roleTypeId,PACKER(java.lang.String)]
> (SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO
> OFBIZ.AGREEMENT_ROLE (AGREEMENT_ID, PARTY_ID, ROLE_TYPE_ID,
> LAST_UPDATED_STAMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP)
> VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) (INSERT on table 'AGREEMENT_ROLE' caused a
> violation of foreign key constraint 'AGRMNT_ROLE_PRLE' for key
> (DemoEmployee,PACKER). The statement has been rolled back.)) (Error while
> inserting:
> [GenericEntity:AgreementRole][agreementId,AGR_SALES(java.lang.String)][createdStamp,2021-11-04
> 11:14:26.779(java.sql.Timestamp)][createdTxStamp,2021-11-04
> 11:14:26.779(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedStamp,2021-11-04
> 11:14:26.779(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2021-11-04
> 11:14:26.779(java.sql.Timestamp)][partyId,DemoEmployee(java.lang.String)][roleTypeId,PACKER(java.lang.String)]
> (SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO
> OFBIZ.AGREEMENT_ROLE (AGREEMENT_ID, PARTY_ID, ROLE_TYPE_ID,
> LAST_UPDATED_STAMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP)
> VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) (INSERT on table 'AGREEMENT_ROLE' caused a
> violation of foreign key constraint 'AGRMNT_ROLE_PRLE' for key
> (DemoEmployee,PACKER). The statement has been rolled back.)))
> {code}
> The error message is valid, as the selected party doesn't have the selected
> role assigned to him. But undesirable.
> Even though it is questionable whether a party should be assigned to the role
> of PACKER on an agreement (and lets for the sake of the argument accept that
> it is a valid choice), the user then needs to ensure that the party gets the
> role before the agreement role can be established.
> In order to mitigate this, the user should only be able to:
> # select a role that is applicable to an agreement (e.g. editor, reviewer,
> approver), and then
> # select a party who has such role assiocated.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
