[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-12688.
-----------------------------------
      Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
    Resolution: Won't Do

This is not worth the effort

> Change SystemProperty entity name to BusinessProperty
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-12688
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12688
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ALL COMPONENTS
>    Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch
>            Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
>            Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
>            Priority: Minor
>
> This refer to a comment I made in OFBIZ-7112: https://s.apache.org/ivrq6
> The crux being:
> {quote}
> It's a long time now we have the SystemProperty entity[...] 
> When we discussed about it before the implementation, it was clear that only 
> business (ie not system) properties should be concerned. To be clear, for me 
> the system properties are the properties in files at 
> framework/start/src/main/resources/org/apache/ofbiz/base/start/ and some 
> other files like freemarkerTransforms.properties, fop.properties, 
> catalina.properties, debug.properties, owasp.properties, security.properties, 
> requestHandler.properties, url.properties and maybe some others I missed
> # So the 1st flaw was to name this entity SystemProperty. It should have been 
> named BusinessProperty. We could consider rename it, but that's minor in 
> comparison with the second flaw
> # The second flaw is that we kept the business properties files. To avoid 
> duplication and confusion all the business properties should be in the 
> database and a specific UI should be created to easier handled them.
> TL;DR: We will not resolve the SystemProperties issues w/o no longer using 
> properties files but for the system properties. Of course then renaming the 
> SystemProperty entity to BusinessProperty is necessary. Having a specific UI 
> for DB access for these properties is also necessary. I foresee the webtools 
> as the best place for this UI. It should be accessible by tenants.
> {quote}
> This issue concents only the 1st point



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to