[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17831679#comment-17831679
 ] 

Pierre Smits edited comment on OFBIZ-12965 at 3/28/24 9:05 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

Hi [~jleroux],

We are all aware of the complexities in service definitions in xml

IMO, each entity definition should have entity-auto services regarding the CRUD 
processes, preferably in the datamodel component. And any other more complex 
service definition in groovy or java should call such entity-auto service. 


was (Author: pfm.smits):
Hi [~jleroux],

We are all aware of the complexities in service definitions in xml

IMO, each entity definition should have entity-auto services regarding the CRUD 
processes, preferably in the datamodel component. And any other more complex 
service definition in groovy or java should call such service. 

> Convert WorkEffortServices.xml mini-lang to groovyDSL (partial)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-12965
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12965
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: workeffort
>            Reporter: Nicolas Malin
>            Assignee: Nicolas Malin
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: groovy, mini-lang
>             Fix For: Upcoming Branch
>
>
> Convert the following service :
> * createWorkEffort
> * updateWorkEffort
> * deleteWorkEffort
> * copyWorkEffort
> * createWorkEffortAndPartyAssign
> createWorkEffort contains too functionnal logic on the base code so split it 
> on different services and intoduce :
>  * assocAcceptedCustRequestToWorkEffort, run throught seca
>  * createWorkEffortStatus
> createWorkEffortAndPartyAssign use the entity-auto logic so create services 
> createWorkEffortPartyAssignment, updateWorkEffortPartyAssignment and 
> expireWorkEffortPartyAssignment to make them more generic



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to