Gil Portenseigne created OFBIZ-13184:
----------------------------------------
Summary: Add alternative to performFind group option
Key: OFBIZ-13184
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-13184
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Gil Portenseigne
With OFBIZ-10195 was contributed a way to manage more complex conditions in
performFind service for find screens.
The origin contribution was to offer union within a group condition, this
contribution has change through collaboration before going into the code base
to intersection.
Today the grouping option allow :
<field name="field1"><text-find/></field>
<field name="field1_grp"><hidden value="1"/></field>
<field name="field2"><text-find/></field>
<field name="field2_grp"><hidden value="1"/></field>
<field name="field3"><text-find/></field>
<field name="field3_grp"><hidden value="2"/></field>
<field name="field4"><text-find/></field>
<field name="field4_grp"><hidden value="2"/></field>
The grouped search fields criteria will be added during the search by the AND
operator. Both group are union-ed resulting to (field1 AND field2) OR (field3
AND field4) AND notGroupedFieldCond
In one of our customer project we needed a case :
(field1 OR field2) AND (field3 OR field4)
That cannot be solved with current implementation.
This improvement offer a way to change operator that are used inside and
between groups, with a new alternative using :
<field name="groupConditionOperator"><hidden value="OR_AND"/></field>
This is a new parameter of the type of noConditionFind, that will control the
way the final group condition is built.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
