GitHub user mdedetrich edited a comment on the discussion: How about add a `>>>` operator which alias `via`?
> I'm not a fan of function names like this. I'll go with the consensus but my > preference is to stick with readable names. Even if not everyone is fluent in > English, you can use a dictionary. No dictionary will tell you what `>>>` > means. This is probably not a well known feature, but scala doc automatically come with a hoogle like search feature i.e. if you go to https://pekko.apache.org/api/pekko/current/ you will find a search bar at top and you can search method names such as [flatMapPrefix](https://pekko.apache.org/api/pekko/current/?search=flatMapPrefix) or [via](https://pekko.apache.org/api/pekko/current/?search=via) however embarrassingly symbols like [`~>`](https://pekko.apache.org/api/pekko/current/?search=~%3E) is not working likely due to how the stream API is structured (we should probably file an issue for this). Personally I am not too fussed on this as `>>>` is quite common in idiomatic Scala now and the `scaladsl` should reflect that. With `javadsl` its obviously a different story. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/discussions/969#discussioncomment-8151676 ---- This is an automatically sent email for [email protected]. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
