mdedetrich commented on PR #2405: URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/2405#issuecomment-3450388419
> This is just my view. Naming is hard but renaming methods once released presents its own problems (and the community is using it). I see little reason not to have 2 methods but working towards the fast removal of the pre-existing method is something that I would question. Deprecate the existing one by all means but I would question the idea of removing the existing ione n 2.0.0. We can remove it in 3.0.0. I am not sure what the issue here is, we have removed many (if not all?) deprecated methods in Pekko 2.0.0 a lot of which have more consequences than this PR as those removed methods weren't just aliases. Ontop of that, due to how the documentation is generated if we leave both `gunzip` and `gzipDecompress` then we have duplicate documentation entries. I can see what you mean by fast removal, but practically speaking the kinds of people that will move to Pekko 2.0.x will be able to easily handle the dropped version of method (along with. everything else) where as the other set of people who can't move that fast will continue to use Pekko 1.x which will still be supported and have features backported. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
