raboof commented on PR #340: URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko-projection/pull/340#issuecomment-3506378721
I think it's somewhat a matter of taste: you could argue it's more like a `reference.conf` for the tests (and the equivalent of the `application.conf` is the config included in each test). There's also the option of `application-test.conf`. Doing a quick survey of our current convention (across the repo's I happen to have checked out): ``` $ find pekko* | grep -e test/resources/application-test.conf | wc -l 3 $ find pekko* | grep -e test/resources/reference-test.conf | wc -l 0 $ find pekko* | grep -e test/resources/reference.conf | wc -l 11 $ find pekko* | grep -e test/resources/application.conf | wc -l 69 ``` let's go with application.conf until someone finds a convincing argument otherwise :+1: -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
