WangzJi commented on code in PR #7443:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/pull/7443#discussion_r2152405903
##########
compatible/src/main/java/io/seata/rm/tcc/remoting/parser/LocalTCCRemotingParser.java:
##########
@@ -63,27 +66,37 @@ public RemotingDesc getServiceDesc(Object bean, String
beanName) throws Framewor
@Override
public boolean isService(Class<?> beanClass) throws FrameworkException {
- return isLocalTCC(beanClass);
+ return isTransactionParticipant(beanClass);
}
@Override
public boolean isReference(Object bean, String beanName) {
return isLocalTCC(bean);
}
+ /**
+ * Determine whether there is an annotation on interface or impl {@link
LocalTCC} or {@link TransactionParticipant}
+ * @param bean the bean
+ * @return boolean
+ */
private boolean isLocalTCC(Object bean) {
Class<?> classType = bean.getClass();
- return isLocalTCC(classType);
+ return isTransactionParticipant(classType);
}
-
- private boolean isLocalTCC(Class<?> classType) {
+ /**
+ * Determine whether there is a transaction participant annotation ({@link
LocalTCC} or {@link TransactionParticipant})
+ * on the given class or its interfaces
+ * @param classType the class type to check
+ * @return true if the class has either LocalTCC or TransactionParticipant
annotation
+ */
+ private boolean isTransactionParticipant(Class<?> classType) {
Set<Class<?>> interfaceClasses =
ReflectionUtil.getInterfaces(classType);
for (Class<?> interClass : interfaceClasses) {
- if (interClass.isAnnotationPresent(LocalTCC.class)) {
+ if (interClass.isAnnotationPresent(LocalTCC.class) ||
interClass.isAnnotationPresent(TransactionParticipant.class)) {
Review Comment:
Thanks for the suggestion!
I agree we should encapsulate the annotation check logic, but I suggest
handling it directly in the existing `isLocalTCC()` method rather than creating
a new one. This approach has several benefits:
1. Maintains backward compatibility
2. Method name still reflects its core purpose
3. Reduces changes needed in other code
If we need to add more annotation types in the future, we can simply extend
the condition within this method.
What do you think about this approach?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@seata.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@seata.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: notifications-h...@seata.apache.org
