xuxiaowei-com-cn opened a new pull request, #8175:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/pull/8175

   onProcessEvent() submits onChangeEvent async to a thread pool by default. 
The test asserted changeEventCalled immediately, racing the executor thread. 
Use CountDownLatch with 5s timeout to wait for the async callback before 
asserting.
   
   <!--
       Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
       contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
       this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
       The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
       (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
       the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
   
       http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
       
       Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
       distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
       WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
       See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
       limitations under the License.
   -->
   <!-- Please make sure you have read and understood the contributing 
guidelines -->
   
   - [ ] I have read the 
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/blob/2.x/CONTRIBUTING.md)
 guidelines.
   - [ ] I have registered the PR 
[changes](https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/tree/2.x/changes).
   
   ### Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did
   
   Fix flaky 
`ConfigurationChangeListenerTest.testCachedConfigurationChangeListener()`.
   
   **Problem:** The default implementation of 
`ConfigurationChangeListener.onProcessEvent()` submits the `onChangeEvent()` 
callback to a thread pool via `ExecutorService.submit()`, returning 
immediately. The original test asserted `changeEventCalled == true` **right 
after** calling `onProcessEvent()`, creating a race condition with the pool 
worker thread. Under CI load this fails intermittently:
   
   ```
   [ERROR]   
ConfigurationChangeListenerTest.testCachedConfigurationChangeListener:234 
expected: <true> but was: <false>
   ```
   
   **Fix:** Introduce a `CountDownLatch` synchronization mechanism:
   
   - Call `latch.countDown()` inside the anonymous 
`CachedConfigurationChangeListener.onChangeEvent()` callback.
   - Call `latch.await(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS)` to wait for async callback 
completion with a 5-second timeout.
   - Add `throws InterruptedException` to the test method signature.
   
   ### Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
   <!-- If that, add "fixes #xxx" below in the next line, for example, fixes 
#97. -->
   
   fixes https://github.com/apache/incubator-seata/issues/8174
   
   ### Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)? 
   
   This change is the test fix itself — no additional test cases are needed. 
The updated test uses `CountDownLatch` to ensure the async callback completes 
before asserting, eliminating the race condition.
   
   ### Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
   
   
   ```bash
   # Single run
   mvn test -pl config/seata-config-core 
-Dtest=ConfigurationChangeListenerTest#testCachedConfigurationChangeListener
   
   # Stress test (loop to ensure stability)
   for i in $(seq 1 50); do
     mvn test -pl config/seata-config-core 
-Dtest=ConfigurationChangeListenerTest#testCachedConfigurationChangeListener -q
     echo "Run $i: $?"
   done
   ```
   
   Before the fix, failures occur intermittently. After the fix, the test 
should pass 100% of the time.
   
   ### Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews
   
   - Test-only change — no production code is touched.
   - `CountDownLatch` is the lightest-weight "wait for async completion" 
mechanism in the Java concurrency standard library with zero external 
dependencies.
   - The 5-second timeout is sufficient for normal execution while preventing 
the test from hanging indefinitely in extreme scenarios.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to