liusf1993 commented on issue #3211: Statement "SELECT GET_LOCK('lock10086')"
doesn't work as expected
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-shardingsphere/issues/3211#issuecomment-541517511
> Do we talk about horizontal sharding?
I'm sorry for using inappropriatethe case, which made us be involed into
distributed lock.
Let me describle my case agnin:
I have two db `db1` and `db2`. `db1` ows table `t1`,`t2`,`t3`, function
`f1`, and `db2` only onws `t2`.
Only table `t2` was in partition, so I want sql related to `t1` , `t3`,
`f1` to be executed on db1, only `t2` be executed on `db1` and `db2` according
to it's condition. I use the configuration
`spring.shardingsphere.sharding.default-data-source-name`, now sql related to
`t1` or 't3` was executed on `d1` as expected, but `f2`'s execution was in
random.
My point is on adding default database support for sql without tables.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services
