134130 commented on PR #28428:
URL: https://github.com/apache/shardingsphere/pull/28428#issuecomment-1717575253

   Since ShardingSphere uses `Database Product name` as `Database type` in many 
codes, I also agree concentrate 
    to `Database type`.
   
   > In ShardingSphere's [Design 
Philosophy](https://shardingsphere.apache.org/document/current/en/overview/), 
SQL/NoSQL/NewSQL are considered heterogeneous databases, so can they be 
collectively called databases?
   
   Are you saying database only means Relational databases? I think 
"Heterogeneous databases" contains all of `SQL` `NoSQL` and `Others` which can 
stores data.
   And I suggests `Database kind` or `Database class` to dividing `SQL` and 
`NoSQL` later; `Haskell` uses `Kind` as a type of type 😃 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@shardingsphere.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to