terrymanu commented on PR #39898:
URL: https://github.com/apache/shardingsphere/pull/39898#issuecomment-5742869957

   ### Result
   
   **Review Result: Mergeable**
   
   The local candidate fully implements the 3 general SPI existence validations 
and the 5 rule-specific association validations. No blocking correctness, 
compatibility, or lifecycle issues were found.
   
   ### Evidence
   
   - Configuration-association validation has been moved from database-context 
checkers to the Bean Validation boundary of each corresponding 
`RuleConfiguration`. Rule construction, configuration refresh, and 
persisted-configuration loading all invoke `RuleConfigurationValidator` first.
   - Parameterized tests cover the existing association behavior for Encrypt, 
Mask, Readwrite-Splitting, Shadow, and Sharding. Database-resource, schema, and 
runtime algorithm checks remain in the original checkers.
   - Maven tests for the affected modules completed with exit code 0.
   - Checkstyle and Spotless checks for all changed Java files completed with 
exit code 0.
   - The Sharding KeyGenerator SPI and Readwrite-Splitting LoadBalancer SPI 
were confirmed as direct `compile` dependencies.
   - The repository-level Apache RAT check completed with exit code 0.
   
   ### Coverage
   
   - Candidate type: standalone local candidate.
   - Baseline: `f330493cde761fd210a64fc79cc2ee5abe65ed5b`.
   - Reviewed task delta: 48 files—28 production, build, or documentation files 
and 20 test or test-resource files.
   - Behavior clusters: common validation boundary, Encrypt, Mask, 
Readwrite-Splitting, Shadow, Sharding, and Timestamp SPI validation.
   - Root-cause, blast-radius, tests and runtime, dependency and distribution, 
error-contract, and convergence reviews were completed.
   - Unresolved evidence gaps: none.
   - This result covers code readiness only; remote CI status was not reviewed.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to