wu-sheng commented on issue #6108: URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/6108#issuecomment-758311084
@mrproliu @wankai123 I was thinking about the VM entity for a while, when you were adopting the protocol/format. I think as far as we have adopt the group concept in the naming format, we could simply use `vm::`/`network::`/etc. as the standard prefix when we need to monitor infra entities. All VM or network entity could be treated as service. By that, we don't need to add the VM concept in the core, which impacts the query, which is very complex. Also, we could support VM level topology once we have the data. WDYT? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
