wzqiang1332 opened a new issue, #12502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/12502

   ### Search before asking
   
   - [X] I had searched in the 
[issues](https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues?q=is%3Aissue) and found no 
similar issues.
   
   
   ### Apache SkyWalking Component
   
   OAP server (apache/skywalking)
   
   ### What happened
   
   skywalking version: 10.0.1
   storage: banyandb-0.6.1
   
   the same service_name and instance_name shows two records. I checked the 
attributes and found that the process ID was different between the two times. 
Would a new instance record be generated for each deployment?
   
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c95147e3-78e4-413f-8dac-4623265dee27)
   
   redis is configured using hostname in the program configuration file, and 
the result is displayed in the topology diagram, both ip and hostname. the 
dimp-redis1 ip is 172.17.0.133
   
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9a3da7e9-f1b4-434d-8afd-3af1db1222e3)
   
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9bed4d2d-3b5f-4f79-b572-ac1d4d9d9bf9)
   
   
   
   ### What you expected to happen
   
   Only one record of the same instance_name is displayed. Only one record of 
the same redis instance, ip address, or domain name identified in the topology 
is displayed
   
   ### How to reproduce
   
   Use hostname to configure the redis link, start the service, stop the 
service, and restart it again.
   
   ### Anything else
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Are you willing to submit a pull request to fix on your own?
   
   - [ ] Yes I am willing to submit a pull request on my own!
   
   ### Code of Conduct
   
   - [X] I agree to follow this project's [Code of 
Conduct](https://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to