pboling commented on PR #208:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking-eyes/pull/208#issuecomment-3287900293

   > 
[apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b)
 this is ASF specific, the weak-compatibility might not be applicable to other 
license, though.
   
   1. True, but it is the best information we have to build on, and since this 
project isn't a lawyer it must sit on someone's shoulders.
   2. Logically if an Apache project can include code from any and all licenses 
from category A in a compatible manner, it means they are all compatible with 
each other according to their definition of compatible.
   3. If we don't have a better definition of compatible we should use theirs.
   4. Similar with the weak-compatible.  If any and all of the weak compatible 
licenses can be included (for binary code) in an Apache project, it means they 
must be, according to their definition, compatible with each other, not just 
with Apache.
   
   > I don’t see any email, did you sent to 
[d...@skywalking.apache.org](mailto:d...@skywalking.apache.org)?
   
   Yes. I will send it again!


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@skywalking.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to