kezhenxu94 commented on a change in pull request #32:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking-python/pull/32#discussion_r449075933



##########
File path: README.md
##########
@@ -63,11 +63,12 @@ Environment Variable | Description | Default
 
 There're some built-in plugins that support automatic instrumentation of 
Python libraries, the complete lists are as follow:
 
-Library | Plugin Name
-| :--- | :--- |
-| [http.server](https://docs.python.org/3/library/http.server.html) | 
`sw_http_server` |
-| [urllib.request](https://docs.python.org/3/library/urllib.request.html) | 
`sw_urllib_request` |
-| [requests](https://requests.readthedocs.io/en/master/) | `requests` |
+Library | Plugin Name | Since Version
+| :--- | :--- | :--- |
+| [http.server](https://docs.python.org/3/library/http.server.html) | 
`sw_http_server` | v0.1.0 |
+| [urllib.request](https://docs.python.org/3/library/urllib.request.html) | 
`sw_urllib_request` | v0.1.0 |
+| [requests](https://requests.readthedocs.io/en/master/) | `sw_requests` | 
v0.1.0 |
+| [Flask](https://flask.palletsprojects.com/en/1.1.x/) | `sw_flask` | not yet 
released |

Review comment:
       > How about `0.2.0`?
   
   Because we haven't released it yet, and I don't know whether the milestone 
will change or not (although it's low possibility), the other problem is that 
users may misunderstand that there is v0.2.0 already, saying it `not yet 
release` may avoid unnecessary questions




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to