rusackas commented on issue #14474: URL: https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/14474#issuecomment-870757797
> Additional comments (beyond the polling options): > > **all chart types have a visually similar thumbnail** Agreed on this point. Having a simplified, slightly abstracted thumbnail, with a consistent visual style, would be quite nice. I think/hope we can tackle this, though it might not make it into the first iteration of the effort. The other issue with this, however, is that several plugins in the future may be contributed by the community, and we'll have to find some way to both provide a design system/language, and hold these contributors to a certain standard. > Thus, the litmus test for defining a visualisation type group could be: **_“Can I seamlessly switch to any of the other variants in this group after I've entered the Explore mode?”_** This is an intriguing idea, and would be worth mentioning on [SIP-65](https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/14472) which goes into categorization. However, this could be a LOT of work to implement (it's not true for almost any combination of charts today), and/or would lead to a proliferation of categories if this becomes a requirement. It's definitely a good idea to strive toward though, and it _would_ be the case if we subdivide certain charts (e.g. Pie and Donut, or some of the various line/area/bar implementations of the Timeseries chart) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
