mistercrunch commented on issue #32139: URL: https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/32139#issuecomment-2691620518
> Is that desirable at all I'd say we only put the "main" or "en" string in the macro call. The idea here is that the main language **doesn't** require lookup. Back to using "string ids", currently we do not use string ids, meaning if you change "This is to be translated" to "This is the string to be translated", it effectively **IS** the new string_id to be translated, detaching previous associated strings from it. In many ways, if/when the text changes, it should require a re-translation, but can be nice to be remain attached. > I guess namespacing could be done with asset UUIDs yeah I'm not big on namespacing, I don't think it's commonly implemented in translation frameworks. Adds extra complexity... -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@superset.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@superset.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: notifications-h...@superset.apache.org
