codeant-ai-for-open-source[bot] commented on code in PR #40967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/superset/pull/40967#discussion_r3394221279
##########
superset-frontend/plugins/plugin-chart-echarts/src/Timeseries/transformProps.ts:
##########
@@ -337,6 +342,89 @@ export default function transformProps(
xAxisType,
},
);
+
+ // Dot size by metric (scatter): the size metric's series are excluded from
+ // rendering and instead provide per-point values that scale each marker's
+ // area between minMarkerSize and maxMarkerSize.
+ const sizeMetricLabel =
+ seriesType === EchartsTimeseriesSeriesType.Scatter && size
+ ? getMetricLabel(size)
+ : undefined;
+ const sizeSeriesLabel = isDefined(sizeMetricLabel)
+ ? (verboseMap[sizeMetricLabel!] ?? sizeMetricLabel)
+ : undefined;
+ const valueMetricLabels = ensureIsArray(metrics)
+ .map(getMetricLabel)
+ .map(label => verboseMap[label] ?? label);
+ // When the size metric is also a value metric, the query dedupes them into a
+ // single column, so each point's own value doubles as its size value.
+ const sizeIsValueMetric = isDefined(sizeSeriesLabel)
+ ? valueMetricLabels.includes(sizeSeriesLabel!)
+ : false;
+ const isSizeSeries = (name: string) =>
+ isDefined(sizeSeriesLabel) &&
+ !sizeIsValueMetric &&
+ (name === sizeSeriesLabel || name.startsWith(`${sizeSeriesLabel}, `));
+ const rawSeries = sizeSeriesLabel
+ ? allRawSeries.filter(entry => !isSizeSeries(String(entry.name ?? '')))
+ : allRawSeries;
Review Comment:
**🟠Architect Review — HIGH**
Size-series detection only matches `<metric>` or `<metric>, <group>` names,
so time-comparison size series like `<metric>__1 year ago` and `<metric>__1
year ago, <group>` are not treated as size-only series and leak into
`rawSeries`, causing size metrics for time offsets to render as normal scatter
series and appear in the legend instead of being hidden.
**Suggestion:** Extend `isSizeSeries` (and the related size-series handling)
to recognize the same time-comparison naming patterns used elsewhere (e.g.
`<metric>__<offset>`, `<metric>__<offset>, <group>`, and `<offset>, <group>`),
and use that expanded detection both when filtering non-rendered size series
out of `rawSeries` and when building `sizeLookups` so all size-only
series—including time-comparison variants—are excluded from rendering.
[Fix in
Cursor](https://app.codeant.ai/fix-in-ide?tool=cursor&prompt_id=6766ee0cd5dd43738ddabc3805379f49&service=github&base_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com&org=apache&repo=apache%2Fsuperset)
| [Fix in VSCode
Claude](https://app.codeant.ai/fix-in-ide?tool=vscode-claude&prompt_id=6766ee0cd5dd43738ddabc3805379f49&service=github&base_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com&org=apache&repo=apache%2Fsuperset)
*(Use Cmd/Ctrl + Click for best experience)*
<details>
<summary><b>Prompt for AI Agent 🤖 </b></summary>
```mdx
This is an **Architect / Logical Review** comment left during a code review.
These reviews are first-class, important findings — not optional suggestions.
Do NOT dismiss this as a 'big architectural change' just because the title says
architect review; most of these can be resolved with a small, localized fix
once the intent is understood.
**Path:**
superset-frontend/plugins/plugin-chart-echarts/src/Timeseries/transformProps.ts
**Line:** 364:370
**Comment:**
*HIGH: Size-series detection only matches `<metric>` or `<metric>,
<group>` names, so time-comparison size series like `<metric>__1 year ago` and
`<metric>__1 year ago, <group>` are not treated as size-only series and leak
into `rawSeries`, causing size metrics for time offsets to render as normal
scatter series and appear in the legend instead of being hidden.
Validate the correctness of the flagged issue. If correct, How can I resolve
this? If you propose a fix, implement it and please make it concise.
If a suggested approach is provided above, use it as the authoritative
instruction. If no explicit code suggestion is given, you MUST still draft and
apply your own minimal, localized fix — do not punt back with 'no suggestion
provided, review manually'. Keep the change as small as possible: add a guard
clause, gate on a loading state, reorder an await, wrap in a conditional, etc.
Do not refactor surrounding code or expand scope beyond the finding.
Once fix is implemented, also check other comments on the same PR, and ask
user if the user wants to fix the rest of the comments as well. if said yes,
then fetch all the comments validate the correctness and implement a minimal fix
```
</details>
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]