amaannawab923 commented on code in PR #42088:
URL: https://github.com/apache/superset/pull/42088#discussion_r3632706238
##########
superset-frontend/plugins/plugin-chart-ag-grid-table/src/AgGridTableChart.tsx:
##########
@@ -368,75 +385,202 @@ export default function TableChart<D extends DataRecord
= DataRecord>(
[emitCrossFilters, setDataMask, timeGrain, timestampFormatter],
);
+ const drillColumns = isUsingTimeComparison
+ ? (filteredColumns as InputColumn[])
+ : (columns as InputColumn[]);
+
+ const handleContextMenu = useCallback(
+ (event: CellContextMenuEvent) => {
+ if (!onContextMenu || isRawRecords || !event.column || !event.data) {
+ return;
+ }
+ const nativeEvent = event.event as MouseEvent | null | undefined;
+ if (!nativeEvent) return;
+ nativeEvent.preventDefault();
+ nativeEvent.stopPropagation();
+
+ const rowData = event.data as Record<string, DataRecordValue>;
+ const key = event.column.getColId();
+ const cellValue = event.value as DataRecordValue;
+ const colDef = event.column.getColDef();
+ const isMetric = Boolean(
+ colDef.context?.isMetric || colDef.context?.isPercentMetric,
+ );
+
+ const drillToDetailFilters: BinaryQueryObjectFilterClause[] = [];
+ drillColumns.forEach(col => {
+ if (col.isMetric || col.isPercentMetric) return;
+ const dataRecordValue = rowData[col.key];
+
+ if (
+ dataRecordValue == null ||
+ (dataRecordValue instanceof DateWithFormatter &&
+ dataRecordValue.input == null)
+ ) {
+ drillToDetailFilters.push({
+ col: col.key,
+ op: 'IS NULL' as any,
+ val: null,
+ });
+ } else if (col.dataType === GenericDataType.Temporal && timeGrain) {
+ const startTime =
+ dataRecordValue instanceof Date
+ ? dataRecordValue
+ : new Date(dataRecordValue as string | number);
+
+ if (Number.isNaN(startTime.getTime())) {
+ // Malformed temporal value: fall back to an equality filter
+ // instead of building a TEMPORAL_RANGE, since toISOString()
+ // throws on an Invalid Date and would crash the context menu.
+ const sanitizedValue = extractTextFromHTML(dataRecordValue);
+ drillToDetailFilters.push({
+ col: col.key,
+ op: '==',
+ val: sanitizedValue as string | number | boolean,
+ formattedVal: formatColumnValue(col, sanitizedValue)[1],
+ });
+ } else {
+ const [rangeStartTime, rangeEndTime] = getTimeRangeFromGranularity(
+ startTime,
+ timeGrain,
+ );
+ const timeRangeValue = `${rangeStartTime.toISOString()} :
${rangeEndTime.toISOString()}`;
+
+ drillToDetailFilters.push({
+ col: col.key,
+ op: 'TEMPORAL_RANGE',
+ val: timeRangeValue,
+ grain: timeGrain,
+ formattedVal: formatColumnValue(col, dataRecordValue)[1],
+ });
+ }
+ } else {
+ const sanitizedValue = extractTextFromHTML(dataRecordValue);
+ drillToDetailFilters.push({
+ col: col.key,
+ op: '==',
+ val: sanitizedValue as string | number | boolean,
+ formattedVal: formatColumnValue(col, sanitizedValue)[1],
+ });
+ }
+ });
+
+ const isCellValueNull =
+ cellValue == null ||
+ (cellValue instanceof DateWithFormatter && cellValue.input == null);
+
+ onContextMenu(nativeEvent.clientX, nativeEvent.clientY, {
+ drillToDetail: drillToDetailFilters,
+ crossFilter: isMetric
+ ? undefined
+ : getCrossFilterDataMask({
Review Comment:
Adding a cross filter from the context menu applies the filter but the row
does not get highlighted, unlike clicking a cell to cross-filter.
The active-cross-filter highlight here is driven entirely by AG Grid's row
selection (`ag-row-selected`): the click path sets it via `handleCellClicked`
-> `event.node.setSelected(...)`, and `getCellClass` adds no highlight based on
the active filter value. `handleContextMenu` builds the cross-filter mask via
`getCrossFilterDataMask` and dispatches it through `onContextMenu`, but it
never selects the corresponding row, so the applied cross filter has no visual
selection.
V1 (classic table) highlights from the active filter value itself, so it
shows regardless of whether you clicked a cell or used the menu. Could we
either (a) select the matching row(s) when the cross filter is applied from the
menu, or (b) drive the highlight from the active cross-filter value so it is
path-independent and matches V1? (b) is probably more robust since it also
survives re-renders and server-side re-queries.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
