aglinxinyuan commented on code in PR #6310:
URL: https://github.com/apache/texera/pull/6310#discussion_r3556446599


##########
amber/src/test/scala/org/apache/texera/amber/engine/architecture/coordinator/promisehandlers/RetrieveWorkflowStateHandlerSpec.scala:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.texera.amber.engine.architecture.coordinator.promisehandlers
+
+import org.apache.texera.amber.core.workflow.{PhysicalPlan, WorkflowContext}
+import org.apache.texera.amber.engine.architecture.coordinator.{
+  CoordinatorAsyncRPCHandlerInitializer,
+  CoordinatorConfig,
+  CoordinatorProcessor
+}
+import 
org.apache.texera.amber.engine.architecture.rpc.controlcommands.EmbeddedControlMessageType.NO_ALIGNMENT
+import org.apache.texera.amber.engine.architecture.rpc.controlcommands.{
+  AsyncRPCContext,
+  ControlInvocation,
+  EmptyRequest,
+  PropagateEmbeddedControlMessageRequest
+}
+import 
org.apache.texera.amber.engine.architecture.rpc.workerservice.WorkerServiceGrpc.METHOD_RETRIEVE_STATE
+import 
org.apache.texera.amber.engine.architecture.worker.WorkflowWorker.MainThreadDelegateMessage
+import org.apache.texera.amber.engine.common.ambermessage.WorkflowFIFOMessage
+import org.apache.texera.amber.engine.common.virtualidentity.util.COORDINATOR
+import org.apache.texera.amber.engine.e2e.TestUtils.buildWorkflow
+import org.apache.texera.amber.operator.TestOperators
+import org.scalatest.flatspec.AnyFlatSpec
+
+import scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer
+
+/**
+  * `retrieveWorkflowState` is the coordinator-side entry point that fans a 
"collect your state" request
+  * out to every operator in the running workflow.
+  *
+  * It does so by wrapping the workflow's physical operators into a single 
`PropagateEmbeddedControlMessageRequest`
+  * (targeting the `retrieveState` worker method) and dispatching it to itself 
via `coordinatorInterface`. The
+  * returned `Future` only completes once every worker replies, which never 
happens in a plain-JVM spec with no
+  * live workers -- so these tests do not await it. Instead they capture the 
one control message the handler
+  * dispatches synchronously through the coordinator's output handler and 
assert on its shape.
+  *
+  * The harness mirrors the worker-side `EndHandlerSpec`: build a real 
`CoordinatorProcessor` plus a
+  * `CoordinatorAsyncRPCHandlerInitializer`, then invoke the handler method 
directly (no ActorSystem).
+  */
+class RetrieveWorkflowStateHandlerSpec extends AnyFlatSpec {
+
+  private val rpcContext = AsyncRPCContext(COORDINATOR, COORDINATOR)
+
+  /**
+    * Build a coordinator handler initializer whose dispatched output messages 
are appended to the returned
+    * buffer. `workflowScheduler.physicalPlan` defaults to null, so callers 
must assign it before invoking the
+    * handler (line 47 of the handler dereferences it).
+    */

Review Comment:
   Dropped the line-number reference — the scaladoc now just says the handler 
dereferences `physicalPlan` (9cde8cd).



##########
amber/src/test/scala/org/apache/texera/amber/engine/architecture/coordinator/promisehandlers/RetrieveWorkflowStateHandlerSpec.scala:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.texera.amber.engine.architecture.coordinator.promisehandlers
+
+import org.apache.texera.amber.core.workflow.{PhysicalPlan, WorkflowContext}
+import org.apache.texera.amber.engine.architecture.coordinator.{
+  CoordinatorAsyncRPCHandlerInitializer,
+  CoordinatorConfig,
+  CoordinatorProcessor
+}
+import 
org.apache.texera.amber.engine.architecture.rpc.controlcommands.EmbeddedControlMessageType.NO_ALIGNMENT
+import org.apache.texera.amber.engine.architecture.rpc.controlcommands.{
+  AsyncRPCContext,
+  ControlInvocation,
+  EmptyRequest,
+  PropagateEmbeddedControlMessageRequest
+}
+import 
org.apache.texera.amber.engine.architecture.rpc.workerservice.WorkerServiceGrpc.METHOD_RETRIEVE_STATE
+import 
org.apache.texera.amber.engine.architecture.worker.WorkflowWorker.MainThreadDelegateMessage
+import org.apache.texera.amber.engine.common.ambermessage.WorkflowFIFOMessage
+import org.apache.texera.amber.engine.common.virtualidentity.util.COORDINATOR
+import org.apache.texera.amber.engine.e2e.TestUtils.buildWorkflow
+import org.apache.texera.amber.operator.TestOperators
+import org.scalatest.flatspec.AnyFlatSpec
+
+import scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer
+
+/**
+  * `retrieveWorkflowState` is the coordinator-side entry point that fans a 
"collect your state" request
+  * out to every operator in the running workflow.
+  *
+  * It does so by wrapping the workflow's physical operators into a single 
`PropagateEmbeddedControlMessageRequest`
+  * (targeting the `retrieveState` worker method) and dispatching it to itself 
via `coordinatorInterface`. The
+  * returned `Future` only completes once every worker replies, which never 
happens in a plain-JVM spec with no
+  * live workers -- so these tests do not await it. Instead they capture the 
one control message the handler
+  * dispatches synchronously through the coordinator's output handler and 
assert on its shape.
+  *
+  * The harness mirrors the worker-side `EndHandlerSpec`: build a real 
`CoordinatorProcessor` plus a
+  * `CoordinatorAsyncRPCHandlerInitializer`, then invoke the handler method 
directly (no ActorSystem).
+  */
+class RetrieveWorkflowStateHandlerSpec extends AnyFlatSpec {
+
+  private val rpcContext = AsyncRPCContext(COORDINATOR, COORDINATOR)
+
+  /**
+    * Build a coordinator handler initializer whose dispatched output messages 
are appended to the returned
+    * buffer. `workflowScheduler.physicalPlan` defaults to null, so callers 
must assign it before invoking the
+    * handler (line 47 of the handler dereferences it).
+    */
+  private def newFixture()
+      : (CoordinatorAsyncRPCHandlerInitializer, 
ArrayBuffer[WorkflowFIFOMessage]) = {
+    val sent = ArrayBuffer[WorkflowFIFOMessage]()
+    val outputHandler: Either[MainThreadDelegateMessage, WorkflowFIFOMessage] 
=> Unit = {
+      case Right(m) => sent += m
+      case _        => ()
+    }
+    val cp = new CoordinatorProcessor(
+      new WorkflowContext(),
+      CoordinatorConfig(None, None, None, None),
+      COORDINATOR,
+      outputHandler
+    )
+    (new CoordinatorAsyncRPCHandlerInitializer(cp), sent)
+  }
+
+  /**
+    * Assert that exactly one control message was dispatched and it carries a 
propagate-ECM invocation, then
+    * return the unwrapped request for further inspection.
+    */
+  private def dispatchedRequest(
+      sent: ArrayBuffer[WorkflowFIFOMessage]
+  ): PropagateEmbeddedControlMessageRequest = {
+    assert(sent.size == 1)
+    sent.head.payload match {
+      case ci: ControlInvocation =>
+        assert(ci.methodName == "propagateEmbeddedControlMessage")
+        ci.command match {
+          case req: PropagateEmbeddedControlMessageRequest => req
+          case other                                       => 
fail(s"unexpected control command: $other")
+        }
+      case other => fail(s"unexpected dispatched payload: $other")
+    }
+  }
+
+  behavior of "RetrieveWorkflowStateHandler"
+
+  it should "dispatch a single propagate-ECM control message with no targets 
for an empty plan" in {
+    val (init, sent) = newFixture()
+    init.cp.workflowScheduler.physicalPlan = PhysicalPlan(Set.empty, Set.empty)
+
+    init.retrieveWorkflowState(EmptyRequest(), rpcContext)
+
+    val req = dispatchedRequest(sent)
+    assert(req.targetOps.isEmpty)
+    assert(req.scope.isEmpty)
+    // No running region executions on a fresh WorkflowExecution, so nothing 
to start propagation from.
+    assert(req.sourceOpToStartProp.isEmpty)
+    assert(req.ecmType == NO_ALIGNMENT)
+    assert(req.command == EmptyRequest())
+    assert(req.methodName == METHOD_RETRIEVE_STATE.getBareMethodName)
+    assert(req.id.id.startsWith("RetrieveWorkflowState_"))
+  }
+
+  it should "target every operator of a populated physical plan" in {
+    val physicalPlan = buildWorkflow(
+      List(TestOperators.headerlessSmallCsvScanOpDesc()),
+      List(),
+      new WorkflowContext()
+    ).physicalPlan
+    val (init, sent) = newFixture()
+    init.cp.workflowScheduler.physicalPlan = physicalPlan
+
+    init.retrieveWorkflowState(EmptyRequest(), rpcContext)
+
+    val expectedOps = physicalPlan.operators.map(_.id).toSeq
+    val req = dispatchedRequest(sent)
+    assert(expectedOps.nonEmpty)
+    assert(req.targetOps == expectedOps)
+    assert(req.scope == expectedOps)

Review Comment:
   Good catch — now comparing set-wise (`req.targetOps.toSet == 
physicalPlan.operators.map(_.id)`) so it no longer depends on `Set` iteration 
order (9cde8cd).



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to