carloea2 opened a new pull request, #8271:
URL: https://github.com/apache/texera/pull/8271

   ### What changes were proposed in this PR?
   
   Give a tuple constructed from another tuple its own shallow field mapping. 
The initial field values remain the same, but later assignments no longer 
mutate the other tuple.
   
   ### Any related issues, documentation, discussions?
   
   Closes #8270
   
   ### How was this PR tested?
   
   The untouched live probe reported `original_x=2`, `derived_x=2`, and 
`same_storage=True` after editing only the derived tuple. After the fix, 
independent edits remain isolated and `same_storage=False`.
   
   `C:\Users\carlo\texera\texera\.venv312\Scripts\python.exe -c "import 
sys,pytest; 
sys.path[:0]=[r'C:\Users\carlo\texera\texera-worktrees\investigate-bug71\amber\src\main\python',r'C:\Users\carlo\texera\texera\amber\src\main\python'];
 raise 
SystemExit(pytest.main([r'amber/src/test/python/core/models/test_tuple.py','-q','-k','not
 test_hash','-p','no:cacheprovider']))"`
   
   Result: 102 passed and 2 deselected. The excluded upstream Windows timestamp 
hash tests are covered by PR #8174.
   
   `C:\Users\carlo\texera\texera\.venv312\Scripts\ruff.exe check 
amber/src/main/python amber/src/test/python`
   
   `C:\Users\carlo\texera\texera\.venv312\Scripts\ruff.exe format --check 
amber/src/main/python/core/models/tuple.py 
amber/src/test/python/core/models/test_tuple.py`
   
   ### Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   
   Generated-by: OpenAI Codex


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to