On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:03:34 -0500, James Vasile <ja...@hackervisions.org> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:33:08 -0500, micah anderson <mi...@riseup.net> wrote: > > > > Hey james, > > > > i really like your notmuch-retry bits, I've taken that shell script and > > integrated it into my tagging script, thanks! I'm curious if you are > > going to update your patch for notmuch.el ("Calls to notmuch get queued > > and executed asynchronously") to use this, or if you are going to have > > those two continue to be separate ways of retrying? > > Ah, I updated my local version and am putting it through its paces, but > it's already so much better that I should just send in the revised > patch. I'll clean it up and do that tomorrow.
Insomnia: when it comes to sleep, my loss is your gain. I opened a github account and the updated bits are in the retry branch at g...@github.com:jvasile/notmuch.git Carl, if you want the retry functionality, feel free to pull from there or request I post those patches to this list. Note that the retry branch depends on notmuch-retry being in your path, but 'make install' does not know about notmuch-retry. Next step for this branch is to have all errors go to *Notmuch errors* rather than error buffers named for the tag commands. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list email@example.com http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch