On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:47:49 +0100, David Edmondson <[email protected]> wrote: > Search output was already using `timestamp' for a very similar field, > so follow that.
Carl, this seems low-risk and easy to include for 0.3. dme. -- David Edmondson, http://dme.org _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
