On 11/15/2010 05:23 AM, David Edmondson wrote: > i.e. the existence of the multipart/signed wrapper should be > explicit. In general, all MIME parts should be visible.
thanks, this makes sense to me.
> Changing the JSON output in this way would not materially affect your
> proposal, I believe. There'd be some implicit changes in the output (for
> example, if a signature signs a multipart/mixed part your proposal would
> list it as signing the sub-parts of the multipart/mixed, but with my
> additional changes it should be listed as signing the multipart/mixed
> itself).
this is interesting: under your proposed changes, the "signs" element
would not need to be a list any more. it could just be a single part ID.
I think i like that.
"sigstatus" would still need to be a list, though, since you can have a
signature part that contains multiple signature packets.
Thanks for helping think this through, David.
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
