On 00:54, Sun 21 Nov 10, Michal Sojka wrote: > On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Michal Sojka wrote: > > your patch fixes the problem, but it also breaks one of the tests in > > test suite. I created the test for your patch ... > > and here is another test which was in my original synchronization > patches, but Carl decided to remove it. It checks that tagging message > by an unrelated tag does not move the message from new to cur. This test > currently fails. > > In id:"20100323143714.ge28...@blackspot" Ruben wrote that for some mail > readers there is a difference between mails in new and mails without "S" > flag in cur. > > Ruben, is the current behavior problematic for you?
It's not a problem for me. For mutt (which I use often) to have it on 'new' or 'cur' don't makes any difference, if the 'S' flag is not there I see them as 'unread'. Actually in mutt if you read an email and later flags it as 'unread' it moves the email 'cur' and puts the ':2,' without the 'S' flag. For me is the same to have the email at 'new' or at 'cur', the only thing I wanted is to have support to fetchmail new emails. -- Rubén Pollán | jabber:[email protected] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Lo hago para no volverme loco cuando noto que solo me queda un demonio en un hombro por que se ha cortado las venas el ángel que había en el otro.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
