On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:35:17 +0200, Felipe Contreras <[email protected]> wrote: > Why it's not? The emacs UI is not really doing anything on top of > 'notmuch reply'. And if it is, it can very well override that value. > Besides, what about other users (vim)? Why not make the output of > 'notmuch reply' ready to be dumped to sendmail?
I think this is a reasonable point. But is there a reason that vim can't fill in the Message-ID and User-Agent fields? Presumably it does when composing new messages, right? That said, if the pre-filling in those fields will help other user agents, then I don't see the binary shouldn't do that. Like you said, other user agents (like emacs) can change them if they see fit. > It seems right now there's a lot of reliance on emacs UI, and gnus. I don't think there's any reliance on gnus. I certainly don't use it. jamie.
pgpCkzkhtcU2w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
