Jameson Rollins <jroll...@finestructure.net> writes: > If folks have suggestions for disambiguating tag names that don't > themselves create further confusion on some other front, then I'm > inclined to just go with the simplest and most straightforward tag name.
Are persistent tags required here? The original question at least, seemed to just be asking for a visual indicator that a message has encrypted or signed bits. So I wondered if that might be accomplished without actual tags. Just curious. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list email@example.com http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch