On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:03:01 +0200, Florian Friesdorf <f...@chaoflow.net> wrote:
> Is it sane to have python bindings that need updates or would a plain
> wrapper of the notmuch script (that maybe needs less updates) be better?
> I don't want to imply that this can be answered with yes/no, but more to
> get a comparison of the two approaches.

Invoking notmuch the script and piping the results? I wouldn't call that
python bindings anymore then. Also it is bound to be much more expensive
than directly interfacing libnotmuch.so.

> Naïvely, I imagine there is a header file and the generation of the
> python bindings happens rather automagic.

I wish it would be that easy. :-)


Attachment: pgpgbZjHlGYh1.pgp
Description: PGP signature

notmuch mailing list

Reply via email to