On Thu, 12 May 2011 09:18:48 -0400, Austin Clements <amdra...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Pieter Praet <pie...@praet.org> wrote: > > The atomicity tests were failing here because I didn't have GDB > > installed, so I've added it as a prereq. > > Sorry, I've had a patch to address that sitting around, but hadn't > sent it out (and I only fixed that one test). I would suggest a > somewhat gentler approach than "error", though: > > if test_expect_success "prereq: gdb is present" "which gdb"; then > test_set_prereq GDB > fi > > (Plus the two test-lib patches I just sent: > id:1305206080-17461-1-git-send-email-amdra...@mit.edu and > id:1305206110-17511-1-git-send-email-amdra...@mit.edu). > > "error" has the disadvantage that it doesn't get counted as a failed > test in the final tally (because, indeed, it's not a failed test) and > also that it immediately terminates the test script so it's not > actually using the prereq system (which is fine for the atomicity test > since all of the test cases depend on GDB, but the pattern I'm > proposing works for finer-grained prerequisites). Plus, with the > above approach, if you don't have a prerequisite, the final tally > shows one failed test plus some number of skipped tests (and the total > number of tests never changes), which I would argue is cleaner.
Much obliged for the correction! Peace  git://github.com/praet/notmuch.git for-review/test-prereqs-v2 c9a785fc5c48db13 -- Pieter _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list email@example.com http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch