On Mon, 16 May 2011 09:29:19 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jroll...@finestructure.net> wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:27:52 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal <jrosent...@jhu.edu> > wrote: > > The decision, if I remember correctly, was that regions are so intuitive > > for emacs users, and many people reported trying to tag by region > > without thinking about it, that this approach would make sense for the > > emacs interface. In other words, keep the emacs interface emacsy. I > > think I still agree with that, since I feel like having both would be > > confusing (what do you do when you select a marked-line in a region?) > > and I like the one I tend toward intuitively. But I certainly see the > > benefit of the other functionality as well. > > I should mention that in my experience it's usually not that hard to > construct searches (or filters on searches) that pair down to just the > messages you want to tag, in which case you can just tag the entire > buffer.
Maybe its more a question of key bindings: 1. add some special tag to messages 2. filter on this tag 3. do something with the whole buffer 4. remove special tag from all messages 5. close filter I'd welcome a standard set of key bindings for it. -- Florian Friesdorf <f...@chaoflow.net> GPG FPR: 7A13 5EEE 1421 9FC2 108D BAAF 38F8 99A3 0C45 F083 Jabber/XMPP: f...@chaoflow.net IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch