Pulled the latest. Fixes the reply issue - but frequently gets emacs to dump core. Looking at the backtrace reminds me why I hate emace some times :-) - it appears to happen in a memmove - but everything else in the backtrave is useless
Not an improvement. /D On Tue, 24 May 2011 12:50:20 -0700, Carl Worth <cwo...@cworth.org> wrote: Non-text part: multipart/signed > On Mon, 23 May 2011 19:46:41 -0700, Dirk Hohndel <hohn...@infradead.org> > wrote: > > Hehe, as the reply below shows... there's still something screwy even > > with the latest git version... in multipart messages things just go > > wrong. Whether I reply (this below should have included your text/plain > > part as quote) > > You caught me again, on two points: > > 1. Our multipart testing wasn't testing "notmuch reply" > > 2. I wasn't actually running the latest code in my own use > > I've addressed both of those problems, which made it easy to find and > fix the segfault that was causing the missing data in the reply > buffer. I will hopefully be in a good habit now of creating a Debian > package and installing and using it locally as part of my testing of > major changes. > > Meanwhile, I did just push Jameson's recent new-show-part branch (along > with some updates from me). This should complete the big upheaval of > changes to how multipart messages are handled. From here, Jameson will > rebase his crypto branch so we can verify signatures and decrypt > messages within emacs. > > > or whether I try to see the html part of a text/plain + > > text/html multipart message... > > This is an area where there have been some recent feature changes---and > again, sadly, there's still some missing testing of the emacs features. > > The change I am seeing is that previously whenever a message had both a > text/plain part and a corresponding text/html part (withing > multipart/alternative), emacs would render both of them. > > Instead, I'm now seeing the text/plain part followed by: > > [ text/html (not shown) ] > > As far as that goes, this hiding of the HTML by default is exactly what > I want. (If people don't want this, there's a > notmuch-show-all-multipart/alternative-parts variable that can be > tweaked. Or just do "M-x customize-group notmuch" and find the setting > there.) > > Meanwhile, I can imagine that some people might actually need to view > the HTML part that's initially not shown. I just tried hitting 'V' on > the "(not shown)" button and I got several image-viewer windows, each > showing one of the contained images. That's not ideal---it would be > better to get some web browser to display the entire message formatted > correctly. > > Maybe that's just something I need to customize on my end, (though, if > so, I think notmuch could do a better job arranging that for the user). > > So contributions would be welcome in this area, (both functional > improvements to the emacs interface as well as additional testing of > those emacs features). > > -Carl > > -- > carl.d.wo...@intel.com Non-text part: application/pgp-signature -- Dirk Hohndel Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch