On Thu, 26 May 2011 14:31:30 -0700, Carl Worth <cwo...@cworth.org> wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2011 14:26:34 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin > <dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It is called indirectly. What is the best way to fix it? I imagine > > that we can replace `isearch-range-invisible' function with another one, > > which would call the fixed function if some special variable is set, or > > if we are searching in a notmuch-show view. Otherwise it would call the > > original function. > > I'm not sure what the best approach would be. I'd like to be a good > "emacs citizen" but I don't know what the best way to do that is here. >
Agreed on being a good "emacs citizen". > If we can predict what the first emacs release will be that contains the > fix, then we could restrict our kludge here to older, unfixed > emacs. That would help avoid some problems with "bad citizenship here". > > I'm willing to take whatever you this is best here. > I have just send two more patches to this thread. One with new tests. Another with a workaround for the bug. The workaround should not break anything since it affects only notmuch-show mode. Regards, Dmitry > -Carl > > -- > carl.d.wo...@intel.com Non-text part: application/pgp-signature _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
