On Mon,  5 Sep 2011 12:01:46 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins 
<jroll...@finestructure.net> wrote:
> The main goal of this overhaul is to define how message/rfc822 parts
> should be handled.  message/rfc822 parts should be output in a similar
> fashion to the outer message, including some subset of the rfc822
> headers.  The following decisions about formatting of message/rfc822
> parts were made:

I have pushed the remaining 3 patches in the series. Namely this one,
and the last 2 from the previous series. I added a brief note to the
commit message about the one test which fails.  I think on the whole the
approach Jamie took of writing the test as the specification is the
correct one. 

d
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Reply via email to