On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:22:39 -0400, Ben Gamari <bgamari.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can see at least two ways of doing this, > > 1) Acknowledging that we use talloc and allowing users to use > talloc_ref and talloc_unlink directly > > 2) Wrapping talloc by adding a *_ref() and *_unref() to each object > I should not that these aren't quite as trivial as they sound. As I neglect to mention in this message, we currently use talloc_free in *_destroy(). As of talloc-2.0, talloc_free() fails on objects with more than one parent. When we allow library users to add their own references to notmuch objects, this assumption will break. Sorry for the confusion,
Cheers, - Ben _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
