On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:42:33 +0200, Daniel Schoepe <[email protected]> wrote:
>. There is also a number of patches that have been reviewed by > long-term contributors, but are then seemingly forgotten (I can find > some concrete examples of this, if this claim is in doubt). <pet-project-promotion> Maybe you can tag those patches as "notmuch::reviewed" using nmbug? [1] My idea is that notmuch search tag:notmuch::patch and tag:notmuch::reviewed should give a kind of consensus set of "ready to go" patch sets. Don't worry about if I or someone else disagrees with your assessment, we can always untag it, and leave a comment in the commit log. [2] </pet-project-promotion> There are also plenty of patches that are not reviewed at all. I'm not defending the state of patch integration, but I think we could use some more reviews as well. d [1]: http://notmuchmail.org/nmbug/ [2]: nmbug log $id could be defined as something like "cd $HOME/.nmbug && git log -- tags/$(echo $id | sha1sum -)"
pgp3clgVyGTiC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
