On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:05:22 +0200, Jani Nikula <[email protected]> wrote: > It would, but as I wrote in id:"[email protected]", I think that > should come as another patch afterwards. I know I can't decide yet what > should be passed and how. Processed message counts (added, deleted, > renamed) could be passed on the command line, but how useful is that > really? The same can be easily achieved through initial tagging.
I would say that probably the best way to pass information to the hook scripts is via the environment. For instance, notmuch could pass the variable NOTMUCH_NEW_MESSAGES containing the number of new messages to the post-new script. jamie.
pgpoG5ZoAjlGX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
