On 12/23/2011 11:40 AM, Dan Bryant wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 06:51:01 -0500, Darren McGuicken > <mailing-notm...@fernseed.info> wrote: >> When you make those changes to the gpg_context are you breaking gpg >> signature validation? Or is the one a superset of the other? > > The current assumption in notmuch is that all encrypted/signed messages > in a mailbox will be using the same crypto algorithm. This is the first > thing I want to fix: which crypto algorithm (and therefore, context > object) to use should probably be detected by the MIME type of the > message part.
This was an issue i was hoping would get resolved in gmime 2.6, but apparently it's still open: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641848 So it does look like we're going to need to do the detection and selecion ourselves. --dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch