On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:36:07 +0200, Tomi Ollila <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:07:40 +0000, David Edmondson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:33:58 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin 
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I did not follow the rest of the discussion, so sorry if I missed
> > > something obvious.  But why can't we render HTML parts in replies the
> > > same way we do in notmuch-show (using `mm-display-part')?  That should
> > > not introduce a w3m.el requirement, would use the same renderer as
> > > configured for show and hence would produce consistent output in show
> > > and reply.
> > 
> > Agreed, that would be good. It could be done as a second stage, though.
> 
> For the record. I built emacs 23.3 from source and after installation
> by default there is no w3m module available.

Currently it's broken for everyone. With the proposed changes it will be
fixed for some people. Further improvements will, of course, be
possible.

Attachment: pgpM4Iy20CnZo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
[email protected]
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Reply via email to