On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:48:42 -0500, Austin Clements <[email protected]> wrote: > Did you consider using point-max instead of mark? IIRC, that mark was > very recently introduced which, perhaps irrationally, makes it seem > less future-proof to me.
Well, if the patch goes in and someone changes the code so that it no longer sets the mark (in the same way), they will be the one breaking stuff, and they’ll have to come up with the fix themself. Using point-max would include the signature in the quoting as well. It would probably be fairly odd to want to put an MML tag in one’s signature, but that doesn’t mean that we should break that usage. > > > > > (defun notmuch-mua-forward-message () > > (message-forward) > > Speaking of future-proofing, it would be good to have a test. It would. ;) I’ll work on one. -- Aaron Ecay _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
