On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:53:39 -0500, Aaron Ecay <e...@sas.upenn.edu> wrote:
> I’m personally of the opinion that notmuch should just say “the mail
> composition facility is provided by message mode (here is the
> documentation on customizing it)”.

In general, +1.

> One possible step that might ease the transition pain could be for
> notmuch’s emacs interface to have a configuration file (similar to
> Wanderlust’s ~/.wl; I believe Gnus also uses a ~/.gnus).  The idea is
> that this file contains elisp code, and is loaded by notmuch the first
> time any notmuch-related commands are invoked by the user.

This is how my own configuration is stored (in ~/.notmuch.el).

> I’ll close with an example of a nice feature that message mode has
> (which I’ve been really wanting since the reply keybindings changed)
> that notmuch would get for free if it hooked into message mode better:
> the function message-widen-reply takes a reply-to-sender message and
> makes it reply-to-all.

That would require a bunch of work on our side to prepare the data that
message-mode uses, but would indeed be nice.

Attachment: pgpVqNNOSanBQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Reply via email to