On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 16:13, Jani Nikula <[email protected]> wrote: >> + (set-mark (point)) >> + (goto-char start) >> + ;; Quote the original message according to the user's configured style. >> + (message-cite-original) >> + (goto-char (point-max))))) >> + >> + (push-mark) >> (message-goto-body) >> - ;; Original message may contain (malicious) MML tags. We must >> - ;; properly quote them in the reply. Note that using `point-max' >> - ;; instead of `mark' here is wrong. The buffer may include user's >> - ;; signature which should not be MML-quoted. >> - (mml-quote-region (point) (mark))) > > Is it okay to drop mml quoting? Why?
As Austin pointed out on an earlier version, message-cite-original already does the quoting, so doing it ourselves will result in double-quoting MML tags. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
